- Abuse of Office (20)
- Bribery (15)
- Conflict of Interest (2)
- Conspiracy to commit an offence of corruption and economic crime (5)
- Corruption (2)
- Engaging in a project withoutprior planning (1)
- False accounting (6)
- Fraud (11)
- Receiving a bribe (60)
- Soliciting for a benefit (73)
- Stealing (4)
- Wilful failure to comply with the law relating to the management of funds and incurring of expenditures (5)
- About rada
ACC 4 OF 2016 - Republic vs Pius Kundu Makari and David Oduor Oketch
Summary: The accused persons who were employees of the Nairobi Water and Sewerage Company working as Security Supervisor and Security Assistant were arraigned in court for allegedly soliciting and receiving a bribe of Kes. 200,000 from Mohamed Noor Salah in exchange for them to reconnect his water supply, and also for them not to take the customer to court for stealing water. The customer visited EACC offices where the case was tasked to be handled by Mr Bernard Juma, who would be the Investigator. They laid a trap to nab the two as they received the bribe money by fitting the customer with a gadget to record the conversation between the himself and the two NAWASCO employees, and tagged currency which would be used by the customer as bribe money. The customer met the two and they demanded the bribe, which the customer handed over. He then alerted EACC officers who were standing by, and they came in and arrested the two and charged them in a court of law.
Case Information
First offence date: 03/Apr/2016
Start date: 01/Jan/2016
Ruling date: 01/Jan/1970
Defendant plea:
Amount involved: KES 200,000.00
Type of case: Soliciting for a benefit, Receiving a bribe
Resolution comments:
Charge
Plea
Fine amount
Judgement
Count 1 - Corruptly soliciting for a benefit contrary to Section 39(3)(a) as read with Section 48(1) of the Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Act.
Not guilty
0.00
Acquittal
Count 2 - Corruptly soliciting for a benefit contrary to Section 39(3)(a) as read with Section 48(1) of the Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Act.
Not guilty
0.00
Conviction
Count 3 - Corruptly receiving a benefit contrary to Section 39(3)(a) as read with Section 48(1) of the Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Act
Not guilty
0.00
Conviction